Skip to the main content.
Get Started Sign In
What are you looking for?
Get Started Sign In
Lite

Perfect for users who need access to basic well level data. If you're only interested in a few wells and currently use state sites, this plan is for you.

 

Read More

Essential

All of the essential data and tools you need to succeed

Read More

Plus

Perfect for users who need more data & tools

Read More

WellDatabase Pro

For the pros that require the absolute best data and tools

Read More

If you need data in the US & Canada, we've got you covered.

The industry didn't start with unconventionals and neither does our data. We cover the full historical dataset across every producing state and province. Don't settle for inferior data, check out our coverage for any state or province you're interested in.

Coverage MapT

 

3 min read

Deal Analysis – SRC & PDC

Deal Analysis – SRC & PDC

There’s a lot going on in M&A lately. A trend we’re likely to see increase in the coming months. WellDatabase is uniquely suited to perform deal analysis. The platform enables you to quickly find the data you need and perform analysis in minutes. Here we’ll spend a few minutes reviewing the SRC Energy & PDC Energy merger.

Finding our Wells

The first step is to find the wells we’re interested in. In this type of deal, we’ll start with a high level view of all wells owned by both companies. We’ll use the Operators – Aliased filter and search for SRC ENERGY INC and PDC ENERGY. We’ll also set our map to color by the Current Operator – Aliased. The map comes back like this:

Now there are a couple things we need to clean up. The PDC assets in Ohio and Kansas were sold off (PDC Energy to Sell Natural Gas Assets & PDC Sells Remaining Ohio Utica Acreage). The wells that remain assigned to PDC are dry holes or previously plugged and abandoned wells. Many times states do not bother to update the current operator in these situations. Since we know that PDC & SRC’s wells are exclusively in CO and TX, we’ll just filter to those two states. We’ll also filter down to producing wells. Now our map looks like this:

Comparing these operators and what they look like combined is the primary goal here. Before we do that, let’s take a second to look at PDC’s activity as of late. Specifically TX vs CO development. To do that, we’ll just exclude SRC for a minute and limit the search to wells that have come online since 1/1/2014. We’ll so swap Color By over to State.

Search – PDC Wells in TX & CO since 1/1/2014

Few items to take away

Activity is still primarily in Colorado (~90%). Overall activity is stable.

Comparing Wattenburg Wells

So the real interesting part in evaluating a merger like this is comparing the activity between the two operators. PDC and SRC have been very active in the Wattenburg field with adjacent acreage. This makes comparing these two pretty easy in WellDatabase.

First, we’ll change up our filters to now show all wells for PDC and SRC and use Wattenburg as the field. We’ll also flip the color by back to Current Operator – Aliased.

Another link to the search for those following along – PDC & SRC Wattenburg

Here is our map of the wells in the search along with well count and production analytics.

Both companies operate wells that have been producing for 40+ years. In order to understand how well these companies line up, we’ll go ahead and only look at wells drilled in the past 5 years. All we need to do is add 1/1/2014 into the First Production Date filter.

Here’s that search – SRC & PDC Wattenburg Last 5 Years

Now there is a slew of things we can do. We’re just going to drop in a handful here.

Map and monthly production numbers
6 Month BOE trend over time
Lateral Length trend over time
Proppant mass over time
Proppant loading over time
Days from Spud to Completion over time. Increase in DUCs in recent years are visible.
Max Wellbore size over time. Not sure why they’re so different or if it really matters.
Min Wellbore size over time. Again back to trending together.
Even the best fit B values are close.
Lateral Length vs Twelve Month BOE
Proppant vs Twelve Month BOE

We could keep going, but the jist is that these two companies should make for a good merger. They basically look like the same company already. The combo should produce more of the same with a potential savings in G&A.

The combined companies basic 20 year economics look like this

Just a few more things

  • Offset operators Kerr McGee and Noble make better wells. Diving into the causes behind that is another entire blog.
  • If you’re really in a buying mood, offset operators Extraction Oil & Gas and Great Western fit right in with your profile.
  • Bonus – If you’re looking for a fixer-upper, Highpoint, Crestone, Bonanza Creek, and Bayswater appear to have room for improvement. Again, the details of that one are for another blog.
That’s the bottom four there in the plot.

That’s about it for this blog. Everything you see here is available in WellDatabase. Honestly, it took me longer to type this blog than it did for me to generate the plots & maps above. If you haven’t tried WellDatabase, today would be a good time to start.

Exporting Datasets

Exporting Datasets

One of our biggest requests has been the ability to export data from our database to use in other software for further analysis. Fortunately,...

Read More
Using DCA to Compare Operators

Using DCA to Compare Operators

Out of the 2,435,234 ways to use decline curve analysis, one is to compare operators. Comparing the average type curves for each operator based on...

Read More
Mastering Dynamic Maps

Mastering Dynamic Maps

Facing a challenge in creating captivating visual maps for your presentation? We are here to help you look like the rockstar you are in front of your...

Read More