WellDatabase + NuTech
WellDatabase and NuTech Energy Alliance, LTD are proud to announce the allignment of their platforms to combine the best interpreted subsurface...
You need data. You need mapping. You need tools to analyze that data. Now you can do everything in a single, easy to use platform.
Perfect for users who need access to basic well level data. If you're only interested in a few wells and currently use state sites, this plan is for you.
The industry didn't start with unconventionals and neither does our data. We cover the full historical dataset across every producing state and province. Don't settle for inferior data, check out our coverage for any state or province you're interested in.
Last verified: September 3, 2025
Anyone importing public production data into decline/valuation tools need to know whether a the data is reported at the well level or at the lease/unit level. Additionally, it is imperative to understand whether volumes are split by formation, pool, or reservoir.
The good news is that WellDatabase lets you export data at whatever granularity makes sense. It's not always easy to find the correct level to export data, but we've got you covered.This article provides a practical reference for major US states, US federal offshore (OCS), and Canadian provinces, plus quick tips for PHDWin imports.
Key: Formation/Pool Split? reflects whether monthly disaggregation by formation/pool/reservoir is required (not just a formation on the well header).
State | Formation/Pool Split? | Reporting Level | Cadence |
---|---|---|---|
Colorado | Yes | Well | Monthly |
Alaska (land) | Yes | Well | Monthly |
Wyoming | Yes | Well | Monthly |
North Dakota | Yes | Well | Monthly |
New Mexico | Yes | Well | Monthly |
Texas | No | Lease | Monthly |
Louisiana | No | Lease | Monthly |
Oklahoma | No | Lease | Monthly |
Kansas | No | Lease | Monthly |
Pennsylvania | No | Well | Monthly (unconv); Annual (conv) |
Ohio | No | Well | Quarterly (unconv); Annual (conv) |
Utah | No | Well | Monthly |
AL, CA, FL, IN, MI, MT, NE, NV, SD, VA, WV, WY | No | Well | Monthly |
Region | Formation/Reservoir Split? | Reporting Level | Cadence |
---|---|---|---|
Gulf of Mexico (Federal) | Yes | Well | Monthly |
Pacific OCS (Federal) | Yes | Well | Monthly |
Alaska OCS (Federal) | Yes | Well | Monthly |
Jurisdiction | Formation/Pool Split? | Reporting Level | Cadence |
---|---|---|---|
Alberta | Yes | Well | Monthly |
Saskatchewan | Yes | Well | Monthly |
British Columbia | Yes | Well | Monthly |
Manitoba | No | Well | Monthly |
Canada Offshore | Yes | Well | Monthly |
WellDatabase and NuTech Energy Alliance, LTD are proud to announce the allignment of their platforms to combine the best interpreted subsurface...
We get asked all the time about the method we use to allocate Texas production data. For those who might not know, Texas requires operators to report...
We’ve been discussing all things production and how they pertain to the current market. If you haven’t read the first parts yet, here are the links